Chapter VIII
FOUNDATIONS

... if any would not work, neither should he eat.
—II Thes. 3:10

When the Income Tax Amendment was adopted in 1913, one of its main but unmentioned objectives was the plot to tax the “have nots,” e.g., the productive blue and white collar classes, and leave the “haves,” the millionaire elite, tax free.  In order to accomplish this purpose it had to be presented as a humanitarian, generous and socially desirable measure.  In keeping with Karl Marx’s money-minded platform, it was an ideal method of taxing the middle classes out of existence.  One of the means to accomplish this end was the use of the tax-free foundation.  The foundations were designed with tax evasion and avoidance in mind so that under the guise of philanthropy, millions of dollars could be used for the purposes of rearranging society in accordance with the goals of the neo-feudalists.

The earliest of these foundations were oriented into the field of education, primarily at the university and graduate level.  Educational foundations had been set up even prior to the establishment of the Income Tax Amendment and Federal Reserve Banking Act of 1913, but the purpose of these earlier ones was to gain a footing in the teaching field of American colleges.  The purpose was to train, and ultimately control, the teaching profession and religious seminaries, so that the thinking of the nation could be moulded in the manner which the money masters deemed appropriate.  In order to control man, it is necessary to control his thinking.  This is why the educational foundation was the cornerstone in the building blocks of a Socialist-feudalist society.  The results of this mind manipulation are now evident as the progressive education, anti-individualistic mentality emerges from the colleges and government halls, with club in hand ready to destroy western civilization.  Our youngsters worship the collective and despise the individual.  They have been trained to think in terms of service to others and the good of society.  These deceptive phrases mean one thing to the Insiders, but the youngsters accepting them at face value are quite willing to sacrifice their lives for the “good of society,” which translated means for the financial benefit of the Insiders.  The anti-individualist mentality of the totalitarians is everywhere apparent in our media and educational thinking today.  To see how far they have gone in dehumanizing society, a quote from an Associated Press release dated August 27, 1967 from Weisbaden, West Germany might be mentioned :  Professor Stanley Less of Columbia University remarked before the International Congress of Psychiatry that, “Society may well become depersonalized and desexualized in the next 50 years ... and anyone who tries to be an individual will be looked upon as odd, reactionary and anti-group.”  This would be the final triumph of the cult of behavioral scientists and their followers who hope to reduce man to an automatized robot.

Through the monopoly of wealth and power, the money pool has not only been able to seize the money issuance prerogative, control education and communications, but also to gain control of corporation after corporation.

The turning point in their bid to annex the United States was the pivotal year 1913, when the third coup d’etat of the Insiders was accomplished.  The 17th Amendment, which transferred the election of state senators from sovereign states to “the people”, completed their triple-whammie legislation.  They were now ready to launch their campaign to emasculate the United States Constitution and move this nation toward a Sovietized society with centralized control of all facets of life the ultimate goal.  Through the use of interlocking directorships, a handful of financial pirates were able to direct the financial destiny of our nation and the world.  On December 13, 1911, Mr. George M. Reynolds of the Continental and Commercial Bank of Chicago stated, “I believe the money power now lies in the hands of a dozen men.  I plead guilty to being one of these men.” Huge sums of money were poured into elections, and as a result the conspirators could influence their outcome.  The myth that only a selected few are able to understand “high finance” is carefully nurtured and much of the information regarding economics and finance is deliberately done in such a garbled fashion that it would take a code breaker to understand what is really being said.  The manipulators want people to feel inferior and incapable of understanding economic matters so that they will leave them in the hands of the “experts.”

Let us take a look at the statistics of wealth in America as of 1968.  According to Ferdinand Lundberg in his The Rich and the Super Rich, “less than one tenth of one per cent are millionaires.  Forty five per cent of all households had a net worth of less than $5,000.”^[1]  Is this affluence ?  With continued taxation and inflation, many harried husbands are required to hold two jobs to enable their families to meet the basic needs of our expensive society.  More and more women are obliged to work, often leaving children unsupervised.  This is another factor contributing to increasing juvenile delinquency.

According to Russell Maguire, in his article Concentrated Wealth and Power, “When the Babylonian civilization toppled, three per cent of the people owned all the wealth.  When old Persia went down to destruction, two per cent of the people owned all the wealth.  When ancient Greece fell in ruins, one half of one per cent of the people owned all the wealth.  When the Roman Empire fell on its face, two thousand people owned all the wealth of the civilized world.”^[2]  After the fall of the Roman Empire, the Dark Ages were ushered in.  Some historians feel that this era did not end until all the wealth had been decentralized.

We now face a situation in the United States where, despite our tremendous productive capacity and inventive genius, less than one per cent of the people control ninety per cent of the wealth of our nation.  Behind the control of this one per cent lies the heavy hands of the money monopolists.  Prominent in this group are the Rockefeller interests which are represented in over two hundred corporations within the United States alone.  In Europe, the Rothschild money wields a similar tight-fisted control over much of its industry.  The Society Generale de Belgique is a holding company which controls over 1500 companies located in various nations throughout the world.  Some estimates put the assets of the Rothschild interests in excess of $300 billion.

To understand how our thinking has been twisted into the anti-rational, anti-civilization mold, we must realize that it was all planned that way.  After the management of our economy was officially turned over to the money mafia in 1913, their collaborators immediately set plans in motion to begin the process of making collectivism appear forward looking, avant guarde and the “in” thing.  In 1914 an organization called The Inquiry was established which had representation from The Intercollegiate Society, a group of left-leaning American intellectuals.  The purpose of this group was to recruit and train a coterie of handpicked fanatics who considered themselves a superior elite, capable of deciding the fate of the world and also ruling it.  Within this nucleus of self-annointed snobs the Covenant of the League of Nations was prepared.  This first thrust for world government failed because the United States Senate refused to ratify the treaty.  After this defeat the conspirators reformed their line of attack and one of their first moves was to reorganize the Inquiry into the Council on Foreign Relations.  Few people in America even now realize that the United Nations world government setup was a plot which had been carefully developed since World War I.  Before most Americans could be conditioned into relinquishing national sovereignty, a tremendous propaganda campaign had to be undertaken.  This was launched through the schools and textbooks, television and other media, slanted news commentary and, more recently, the use of nuclear annihilation threat as the basis for foreign policy.  Through the release of such horror films as On the Beach, Dr. Strangelove, etc. and the publication of daily radiation fallout quotations, etc. the climate was established for the gradual phaseout of our military superiority and the complete emasculation of this nation’s supremacy in military, industrial and financial matters.

In England the Royal Institute of International Affairs might be considered a counterpart of the Council on Foreign Relations.  Other similar organizations are the Institute des Relations Internationales in Belgium, and the Indian Council of World Affairs.  Similar groups exist in most of the major powers, and often even in smaller nations.

We must not overlook the interlocking directorship which exists within corporations and often extends into an invisible international government.  Highly placed members of the Council on Foreign Relations occupy positions of prominence in many of our giant corporations and their influence extends beyond corporate corridors into the national, state and even local legislative bodies.

Foundations are one of the most important power centers on our national scene.  Their numbers have proliferated rapidly, having increased from some 13,000 in 1952 to over 45,000 by 1960.  Even the Treasury Department does not know the exact number of tax-free foundations operating within the United States.  Secretary of the Treasury C. Douglas Dillon testified on July 21, 1964 that “the Treasury does not know how many foundations there are.”  It is estimated that there are about 100,000 tax-free foundations in the United States at the present time.  The top ten account for more than one-third of all foundation assets.

BIG TEN AMONG FOUNDATIONS Assets (millions)^*
Ford Foundation $3,580
Rockefeller Foundation 804
Duke Endowment 615
Mott Foundation 424
Lilly Endowment 390
Kellogg Foundation 375
Carnegie Corporation 336
Sloan Foundation 327
Pew Memorial Trust 303
Hartford Foundation 270
* At end of 1967, latest available source : Foundation Center

In the March 3, 1969 issue of U.S. News and World Report, it states that foundations are proliferating at the rate of about 2,000 per year.  In 1960 their assets were estimated to be $11.5 billion, but by 1968 this figure had risen to $20.5 billion.  The amounts reported may not represent the true figure as often assets are carried on the books at less than market values.  A United Press International report of July 19, 1969 stated that the income of the largest 596 foundations is more than twice the net earnings of the nation’s 50 largest commercial banks.  Giant Ford Foundation’s annual income is greater than the world’s largest banking institution, the Bank of America.

A recent Treasury Department study revealed that there are at least 100 major United States corporations in which foundations owned at least 20 per cent of the stock.  It is the belief of this writer that many corporations pay dividends primarily for the benefit of this class of stockholder.  An individual taxpayer benefits little from corporate dividends as they are taxed as ordinary income, but the tax-free foundation giants reap millions of dollars of income through this device.

The following chart shows a partial list of the holdings of the Ford Foundation.  According to the dividend rate in effect at the time of the report, Ford’s tax-free income from the first five stocks alone amounted to $812,000.  This income derives from the first five on the list.  And the 20 companies listed is only a partial list.

Of the top 20 holdings, the fewest number of shares was represented by Corning Glass, with “only” 25,500 shares.  It is clearly apparent that with this kind of taxless cash, the influence which can be wielded is tremendous.

Not every foundation is engaged in subversive or revolutionary activity, but they do all have one thing in common: They have all been set up with the purpose of avoiding taxation and passing the buck on to us, the taxpayers.  Another less celebrated reason for the private foundation is a means of keeping control over wealth.  The negative sounding words “not for profit” really mean that they pay no taxes on their profits.

The establishment of a foundation also gives other advantages to a wealthy individual.  Dr. Martin Larson, noted economist, cites the following advantages to the donor who establishes a foundation :

1.  The property conveyed to the foundation is deductible as a contribution to charity.
2.  No inheritance or estate taxes are levied upon the contribution when the donor dies.
3.  The property remains intact.
4.  If the donor is a parent company, it continues in business as before.
5.  Individuals occupying executive positions gain many advantages through the use of interlocking directorships.

No one can estimate with certitude how many billions of dollars of taxes per year are avoided through these devices, but Dr. Larson believes it might be over $50 billion.  Foundation property may be used by the donor during his lifetime without retaining title.  For example, the multi-millionaire Kennedy family enjoy the use of their many homes which are owned by various foundations without the problems of ownership.  Even the huge Merchandise Mart in Chicago is owned by a Kennedy foundation and until recently, did not even pay real estate taxes.  It was then decided for political purposes to make a token offering which constituted but a fraction of what a corporate owner would have been required to pay.  Dr. Martin Larson further estimates that “the creation of the Ford Foundation has already cost the federal treasury something like $8 or $10 billion” in unrealized taxes.

It is no wonder that the Socialist kingmakers fear any investigations which would expose the true nature of the tax evasion tactics of these foundations to the public.  In 1953 the Reece Committee was appointed by a reluctant Congress to investigate foundations.  One of their reports stated that “... the power of the individual large foundation is enormous.  It can exercise various forms of patronage which carry with them elements of thought control ... It can materially predetermine the development of social and political concepts and courses of action through the process of granting and withholding foundation awards upon a selective basis ... It can play a powerful part in the determination of academic opinion, and through this thought leadership, materially influence public opinion.”

In 1902 John D. Rockefeller, Sr. established an organization known as The General Education Board for “the promotion of education within the U.S.A.”  Several years later its chairman Frederick T. Gates wrote, “In our dreams we have limitless resources and the people yield themselves with perfect docility to our molding hand.”  Let’s see what the “molding hand” accomplished.  At Columbia University in the 1920s Dr. Harold Rugg, a follower of John Dewey, began to specialize in writing for teachers.  In his book The Great Technology, written in 1933, he declares, “A new public mind is to be created.  How ?  Only by creating tens of millions of new individual minds and welding them into a new social mind.”  He further states, “... through the schools of the world we shall disseminate a new conception of government, one that will embrace all of the collective activities of men;  one that will postulate the need for scientific control and operation of economic activities.”  The teachers colleges indoctrinated the teachers and implemented their thought control through the National Educational Association.  What was the result ?  After studying the “Commission on Social Studies” of the American Historical Association (financed by the Carnegie Foundation), Socialist Professor Harold J. Laski remarked, “At bottom end stripped of its carefully neutral phrases, the report is an educational program for a Socialist America.”^[3]

The most serious flaw in the structure of the foundation setup from the standpoint of the average citizen is the element of thought control which is exercised.  Since the officials are generally men of wealth and position, they attract followers.  This is true not only in business and industry but in the educational fields as well.  A bright young student will usually identify favorably with the foundation which offers him a much needed fellowship or research grant.  He will tend to develop attitudes sympathetic toward the objectives and thinking of foundation officials.  This is the indirect method of thought control.  The more direct one is the Fullbright or similar type scholarships which are generally awarded only to students who, when properly investigated, are found to be intellectually reliable.

The Reece Committee found that the foundations tended to develop a bureaucratic structure within and were usually managed by professionals.  They also found “interlock” or cooperation among the powerful big-name funds which included such “intermediate organizations” as the following :

The Social Science Research Council
The Council of Learned Societies
The American Council in Education
The National Academy of Sciences
The National Education Association
The Institute of Pacific Relations
The League for Industrial Democracy
The American Labor Education Service
The John Dewey Society
The Progressive Education Association

The above-named funds were named by the Reece Committee Report as organizations “whose power and influence is enormous.”  How enormous their influence has been may be determined by the change in the thinking of Americans.  A generation or more of citizens has been exposed to the progressive and permissive educational programs advocated by John Dewey and his followers.  It was absolutely necessary for the collectivists to alter individualistic thought patterns in order to soften people up for a dictatorship.  This process, begun slowly and carefully at first, was well under way by the 1940s.  The total impact of what has been done to our children’s minds is now apparent by a glance at almost any college campus in the country.

Textbooks were rewritten and classrooms were used as launching pads for the new order.  By the dawn of the 1970s it is virtually impossible to find a professor who has attitudes even as far “right” as center.  This is the net result of the teaching experiments which have been used as a drug on the American educational market and dispensed with Pavlovian finesse to an unsuspecting student body and gullible public.  Revolutionary ideas have been presented by classroom pundits as remarkably new, noble and progressive.  The most maneuverable swallowed the bait and went out to catch new fish.  Objective analysis of the real goals, aims and purposes were never permitted—as the true “liberal” totalitarian permits no opposition.  Mind manipulation has continued so long that millions of Americans are unable to even argue the merits or demerits of the positions advanced.  These brainwashed citizens mutely accept the doctrines of cartellist One World government advocates as a desirable goal.  They are unaware that the revolution has been planned by the money elite who seek for themselves total monopoly.  To question the ideas, aims and philosophy of the collectivists would be the one heresy not permitted in 20th century America.

It is also difficult to live in a vacuum.  Since the money power is so extensive, any opposing voice is usually either neutralized or bought off.  If occasional cries of agonized individualism persist, the time-honored technique of smear and other propaganda devices are used to discredit them sufficiently so that their protestations are rendered valueless.

On the educational front the propaganda pitch has been to downgrade our nation and teach the “citizen of the world” concept.  The present chaos and disintegration of our educational system may be largely traced to the foundations and their distributions of money.  It is also apparent that the children are not being taught the disciplines which would enable them to master such relatively simple skills as reading, writing grammatically and the use of basic arithmetical methods.  The outlawing of education was instituted under the guise of updating or giving the schools new methods.  The methods were in reality non-methods and accomplished the very purposes they were intended to accomplish.

The dissatisfaction of parents has now reached the point where a continuance of the chaos in the name of education will probably not be allowed to continue indefinitely.  Therefore, the manipulators will move into the next phase—that of thought and ethics control.  We have already seen the effects of permissive education.  Now sex education and sensitivity training are on the agenda to further demoralize our nation’s young.  To successfully alter human behavior it is necessary to (a) predict it, (b) control it.  For this reason the science of behaviorism has received so much vogue in psychological and educational circles.  Those who advocated its use were elevated to top positions in the hierarchy.  Those who opposed it or clung to traditional moral values were dumped or discredited.

Since the days of Pavlov, when his experiments with dogs indicated the possibility of controlling and predicting behavior, it has been the goal of the totalitarians to apply these methods to the general population.  Hitler used this technique to make his followers mindless fanatics.  In Russia they used the same tactics and called it psycho-politics.  In the United States we refer to it as behaviorism.  Needless to say, the population must be led to “new goals” by the experts.  These new goals are now being achieved by the same methods which parade under various names such as sensitivity training, group therapy, group dynamics, encounter groups, human workshops, etc.  They all have the same purpose in mind, that of breaking down traditional moral and human values and the substitution of the “new morality.”  What the manipulators are aiming for is total thought and behavior control of the entire population.

To seize children from their parents at an early age would invoke much resistance, even in today’s apathetic and government-worshiping America.  Therefore, the child must be alienated from his parents’ views and oriented into the thought patterns selected by the conspirators.  It is first necessary to discredit traditional ethical and religious values.  Then political ideologies may be substituted which would not have been adopted by more than a fraction of the population without the use of such mind-destroying methods.

The frantic rush on the part of government to obtain control of the schools is necessary before the direction of our future citizens can be changed.

If you want to peer into the future of ethics control, consider the words of Dr. Joose A.M. Merloo, an expert on the subject of thought control.  In his book The Rape of the Mind, he explains the difference between thought control and persuasion or indoctrination.  Dr. Merloo said, “It is taming, it is taking possession of both the simplest and the most complicated nervous patterns of man.  It is the battle for the possession of the nerve cells.  It is coercion and enforced conversion.  Instead of conditioning man to an unbiased facing of reality, the seducer conditions him to catch-words, verbal stereotypes, slogans, formulas, symbols.  Pavlovian strategy in the totalitarian sense means imprinting prescribed reflexes on a mind that has been broken down.  The totalitarian wants first the required response from the nerve cells, then control of the individual, and finally control of the masses.”

Any objective observer would probably conclude that we are now in the breakdown of the nerve cell stage, where the conditioners are inducing young people to accept dope, disease, directionlessness and disaster as an inevitable way of life.

Unfortunately for the mind manipulators, there still exists a vast storehouse of religion which would prevent the total social engineering of society from planned birth to directed death.  For this reason, the mind destroyers must eradicate every vestige of religion.  The “legal” crutch on which they lean to accomplish this is the overused doctrine of separation of church and state.  Only a totalitarian would despise individuality.  This is God’s greatest gift to man.  We are all individuals.  We are born, live and die as individuals.  Even a group or mob is still composed of individuals.  Consider the billions of people on earth, and, except for identical twins, none look alike.  None have exactly the same personality, nor the same predictable reactions under given circumstances.  We were created as individuals to work out our own destiny.  When our nation was founded, the greatest asset it had was its vast wilderness and a courageous and independent population.  There was a minimum of government;  no power structure with which to cope.  In less than 150 years these enterprising people had created the most progressive, wealthy, and envied nation on the face of the earth.  With continual government interference we are being crushed, weakened, and destroyed.  Total government will complete the annihilation of the individual and nation.  The nature of government is inescapable.  It is totalitarian prone and will do exactly as governments always have done—perpetuate its own power and privilege at the expense of the population at large.

The primary aims of the psycho-politics crowd is to produce the maximum amount of chaos in the culture of the enemy (the United States).  To quote the words of Lavrenty P. Beria, former NKVD chief,

“Our fruits are grown in chaos, distrust, economic depression and scientific turmoil.  At last a weary populace can seek peace only in our offered Communist State ...

“You must labor until we have dominion over the minds and bodies of every important person in your nation ... You must work until suicide arising from mental imbalance is common and calls forth no general investigation or remark ...

“With the institutions for the insane, you have in your country prisons which can hold a million persons and can hold them without civil rights or any hope of freedom.  And upon these people can be practiced shock and surgery so that never again will they draw a sane breath.  You must make these treatments common and accepted.  And you must sweep aside any treatment or any group of persons seeking to treat by effective means ...

“You must dominate as respected men the fields of psychiatry and psychology ... Psycho-politics is a solemn charge.  With it you can erase our enemies as insects.  You can cripple the efficiency of leaders by striking insanity into their families through the use of drugs.  You can wipe them away with testimony as to their insanity.  By our technologies you can even bring about insanity itself when they seem too restive...

“You can change their loyalties by psycho-politics.”

With the advance in drug therapy and science, we shudder to wonder what type of wonder drug these psycho-politicians will use when their mental hospitals are filled with the “politically insane” (e.g., dissenters).

In 1954 an offshoot of the Adult Education Services of the National Education Association was changed to National Training Laboratories (NTL).  Its purposes were to study and implement the goal of the behavioral scientist—human change and how to bring it about.  On the scene now are “change agents” who may be psychiatrists, educators, social workers or even those sympathetic but unaware of the true goals of the manipulators.  Many workshop-type affairs are now being held throughout the nation in industry, police departments and educational institutions.  It’s here, right now—but the wolf isn’t recognized as a ravenous beast but is presented as a kindly reformer who sees evil in the world and has set about to change it—his way.

Lest we forget, the United Nations—and one of its organizations, WHO (World Health Organization) advocates legislation permitting psychiatric treatment.  They want power to incarcerate people whether they are willing or unwilling to accept treatment.  They are also to be full guardians over the property of patients (e.g., no civil rights).  Remember, the United States Constitution is outmoded and we have replaced it with something “new and better.”  Of course, all these goodies are to be on a compulsory basis, supervised by the experts.  Eventually, WHO expects to be the licensing agent for all hospitals and only those which they approve will be allowed to operate.  The same rule of thumb will apply to physicians.  Only those who agree with the tenets of WHO will be permitted to practice.

Is this legislation effective in your state ?  In 1950 the Federal Security Agency (which has now been updated into the Department of Health, Education and Welfare) introduced in the United States legislative principles which would carry out the WHO plan.  This act was known as “Draft Act Governing the Commitment and Hospitalization of the Mentally Ill.”  Over 30 states have adopted all or portions of this Draft Act.  Is yours one of them ?

When propaganda passes from the persuasive stage into the compulsory stage, the above things will be total realities.  We are seeing the transition now.  Be aware of it and be prepared to take the appropriate action.

In order to understand the seductive phrases and ambiguous titles of legislation and propositions it is necessary to fall back on one of the admonitions of one of the top stock market speculators of all time—Jesse Livermore.  He said, “to be successful in this business you have to disbelieve everything you read in the papers.  It is necessary to sift through the news and do your own editorializing.  Pay no attention to what they say just ask yourself three questions :  1.  WHO said it;  2.  WHY did they say it;  3.  WHAT do they want you to do.”  There is always a purpose in a story—especially in a propaganda pitch designed to evoke a particular type of reaction.  Examples of almost hysterical propaganda which assail us continually are such topics as cigarette smoking, air pollution, population problem, student unrest, etc., etc.  We already know WHO said it, therefore we will pass on to the WHY.  They want us to “do something” or condition us into letting someone else do something.  If we analyze the smoke behind the cigarette controversy we might calmly consider the effects of marijuana, heroin and related popular drugs.  If cigarettes are bad—why are dope users continually upgraded and given sympathetic television and news coverage ?  Perhaps stage two, the breakdown stage is now a reality, and the induction of insanity and mental illness (a broader term) is here.  The WHAT is clearly apparent.  We need legislation to cope with the problem—and the legislators are ready and willing to put more regulations on the books giving them more regulatory and police powers.  Why such legislation ?  To prepare the victims for eventual world dictatorship.

Often the purposes of a new propaganda campaign are not apparent at first.  That there is air pollution is undoubtedly correct.  That something should be done about it is also probably correct.  However, the statistics given by the government are unreliable and their purposes are as yet not clearly discernable.  It might be the beginning of a vast attempt to decentralize cities and an exercise in population control.  With this would come more vast powers of condemnation of property, regulation of business and individuals, further encroachments upon individual liberty and the ultimate goal, total control of the entire population through this cleverly-contrived ruse.  Beware of the solutions which the enemy offers when we know him to be a ruthless predator.

An informed public will not be fooled.  And an informed public is exactly what the manipulators fear the most.  This is why all opposing views are ruthlessly crushed.

Can we overcome the enemy—the powerfully, entrenched government, the tax-exempt funds, and their subsidiaries, and the driving force behind the entire facade—the money power ?  It won’t be easy.  We must begin by obtaining correct information.  We must also understand the workings of the corrupt money system with its allied tax dodges such as mutual and cooperative enterprise, foundations and the income tax.  This will be the first step toward our reawakening as a nation.  The second step will be to make these understandings a legislative reality.  Only then will we be able to weed out the treasonous degenerates who have destroyed our nation and heritage for power and privilege.  It will take almost revolutionary resolve on the part of people to drive out the imposters on all levels and reconstruct a society based on the principle of sanity, a limited, constitutional government and individual freedom.

The United Nations Complex and its banking institutions must go—we must obey the constitution and enact an honest money system which will permit the government to spend money into circulation debt free.  In this way the government will obtain the money it needs for those legitimate expenses which are clearly delineated in the Constitution.  We will be freed of the grotesque illegal debt with which we are saddled, and the income tax, as well as estate, inheritance and gift taxes will be abolished.  Government will serve the people as it was intended to do, and not rule as it is now doing.  George Washington knew the danger of government.  As he lead the gallant troops in the defeat of the British in the Revolutionary War, he said, “Government is not eloquence, it is not reason.  Like fire, it is a dangerous servant and a fearful master.”  His words have proved to be too prophetic.

A ray of hope :  What happens when the indoctrinated are exposed to the truth ?  The reactions vary, but here is an interesting example of one single survey made by Campus Studies Institute, P.O. Box 9355, San Diego, California 92109.  This very young and new organization is attempting to combat the effects of revolutionary doctrine on the campuses and has been mailing literature to combat such statements as the one by Eldridge Cleaver of the Black Panthers when he said, “America is up against the wall.  This whole apparatus, this capitalistic system and institutions and police ... All need to be assigned to the garbage can of history ... If we can’t have it, nobody’s gonna have it.  We’d rather provoke a situation ... that will disrupt cities and the economy so that the enemies of America could come in and pick the gold from the teeth of these Babylonian pigs ...” (the average citizen).  Said the Institute, “These are not the words or tactics of the innocent.  They are part and parcel of one of the most ingenious methods of destroying societies conceived of by man.”

Their experiences after making a survey of opinions both before and after a mailing survey :

And this was after only one mailing.  Think of what could be accomplished if the population at large, or even a generous proportion of it, would be alerted to the methods, tactics and aims of the same old left and its grandchild, the “New Left.”  It is only by informing throngs of Americans that we can turn the tide.

Therefore, our most urgent and immediate imperative is to work tirelessly to inform as many people as we can reach.  An aware public will not permit the slave traders to impose their “wave of the future” which is intended to be the graveyard of our civilization.

What are the foundations doing with their money ?  Most of the giant foundations have been using their untaxed income for decades to undermine religion, western civilization, constitutional government and all concepts of individualism.  Both the Carnegie and Rockefeller Foundations had been busy providing funds in educational fields.  In fact, foundations (principally these two) provided the bulk of endowment money for institutions of higher learning in the first three decades of this century.  Rene Wormser, the Reece commissions’ attorney, reported that the evidence obtained during the investigations “... leads one to the conclusion that there was, indeed, something in the nature of an actual conspiracy among certain leading educators in the United States to bring about Socialism through the use of our school systems ...”

The Carnegie Endowment for International Peace is the group which is unofficially planning for the United Nations (United States) to finance and fight a war against South Africa on some flimsy grounds of ending apartheid.  The reason for our involvement will be billed as a liberation movement of some kind.  If Americans are willing to become embroiled in another war for such an alleged reason, we deserve it.  What the money crowd really wants in South Africa is the wealth, gold, industry and strategic importance of that country.  The Carnegie Endowment for International Peace has also contributed funds to the National Service Secretariat, 1629 K Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. which is advocating national service in lieu of a draft for our perpetual wars.  Other foundations which are actively promoting the coolie labor battalion concept of millions of American youth are the Ford, Alfred P. Sloane, Sage and others.

The president of Carnegie Endowment for International Peace is regarded by some Washington insiders as “the permanent unofficial Secretary of State.”  The Carnegie people also sponsored Gunner Myrdal, the Swedish Socialist who wrote An American Dilemma, which was used as the basis of the Supreme Court’s desegregation case in 1954.  This is one of the factors believed by many to have led to so much of the present chaos in our schools.

Other activities of the Carnegie Endowment include huge contributions to the Foreign Policy Association, a Socialist-oriented research group which distributes pan globalist one world propaganda.

Our invisible government, the Council on Foreign Relations, has also been lavishly supported by many of the well heeled funds including Carnegie, Ford and Rockefeller.  The CFR members who have been put in strategic government spots for years have controlled American foreign policy for over three decades.  This exclusive club of the master class include such characters as Robert Strange McNamara and McGeorge Bundy, President of the Ford Foundation, and a list of literally hundreds of others including ex-presidents.

While on the subject of Robert McNamara, we must ponder on the possibility that what happened to our military defenses under his secretaryship, may happen to our money under his presidency of the World Bank.  McNamara also has other unusual interests.  Gary Allen, in his article “Foundations, Swindle, Treason, and Dodge”^[4]  states that two prominent Washington members of a group known as the “Temple of Understanding” are Mr. and Mrs. Robert S. McNamara.  The interesting aspect about The Temple group is that it is tied into the Lucius Trust of London, England which was formerly called the Lucifer Trust, a cult of devil worshippers.  According to Mr. Allen’s article, “the Temple of Understanding centers its ’mystical meetings’ and the union of 'triads’ in a room reserved for it at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace located at the United Nations Plaza ...”

The Ford Foundation has been one of the most activist, anti-American of the foundation giants.  The Foundation holds huge blocks of Ford stock and receives these dividends (tax free) for use in the further dismantling of free enterprise and the planned phaseout of our nation.  In an article appearing in the Chicago Tribune, March 22, 1970 (Section 1, page 24) under an article captioned “Subsidizing Violence and Subversion” it was revealed that “The Senate Internal Security Subcommittee has released testimony by Sgt. Robert J. Thomas of the Los Angeles police department ascribing violence or subversive activity to 49 Los Angeles area organizations with an interlocking directorate.  Sgt. Thomas testified that most of these organizations receive funds from the federal government, the tax-exempt Ford Foundation or tax-exempt church groups.”

Here is a partial list of how the Ford Foundation spends its untaxed dollars :

How much money is available to the right-wing organizations ?  According to News and Views (April, 1968 issue) published by the Church League of America, a report made by Group Research was included giving the approximate dollar amounts given in 1965.  The combined total of money received by the top eleven right-wing organizations was compared to that of the National Council of Churches.  This was the result :

Eleven combined right-wing organizations listed by Group Research for 1965 $ 15,221,100
National Council of Churches Income for 1965 $19,447,516

This list is by no means complete, but its extension would be superfluous.  The bias is clearly indicated.  There has not been an instance where a pro-American organization or one promoting an individualist, religious, constitutional point of view has received one cent from these foundations.

The few selected examples of untaxed money which has been poured into various anti-American activities have not included grants from such other foundations as the Rockefeller, Dillon, Overbrook and dozens of others.

A few of these donations are listed below :

NATIONAL SERVICE SECRETARIAT

$15,000 from Arthur Vinning Davis Foundation in 1968
30,000 from the Russell Sage Foundation
15,000 from the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation

COUNCIL ON FOREIGN RELATIONS
(in one year alone)

$51,000 from the Dillon Fund
15,000 from the Overbrook Foundation
10,000 from the Lehman Foundation
(The Rockefeller Foundations have been heavy contributors to the CFR for years.)

CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY

Another source of subsidized subversion in the United States comes from the United States Central Intelligence Agency (CIA).  Washington Observer disclosed in its May 15, 1968, issue that only the Congressional Watchdog Committee headed by Senator Richard Russel (D., Ga.) is aware of just how much money is annually funneled into this organization.  It is also reported in Washington Observer that much of the money given to the CIA is hidden in other items and other federal agencies;  so it is impossible to know the full extent of public support of these programs.  Washington Merry-Go-Round revealed that the CIA had given the extremist left American Newspaper Guild approximately $1 million in a six year period.  Organized labor was estimated to have received $100 million a year from this government hush-slush fund.

The same CIA funds are used in various nations which the left-extremists dislike.  Angry denunciations have been rendered against the CIA from such diverse sources as Angola and Mozambique, where Portuguese officials charge that funds are used to stir rebellion.  The CIA is exempt from audit and does not reveal how it spends its money (financed mainly by U.S. tax dollars), but also receives grants from foundations.  Columnist Marquis Childs (Washington Post, May 20, 1964) stated that the “CIA’s budget ran upwards of $4 billion annually.”  This outfit subsidizes political elections, black power groups, radical college organizations and it operates on an international scale.  A more conservative estimate is that their income is $1 billion annually.  However, even accepting the lower figure, it is a fantastic amount of money representing just that much less the taxpayers have to spend on purchases of their own choosing.

INSTITUTE OF PACIFIC RELATIONS

Between 1925 and 1950 the Rockefeller Foundation gave them nearly $2 million “to promote the well-being of mankind by contributing to the international understanding in the Pacific.”  The Senate Internal Security Subcommittee in the early 1950’s found that “the IPR has been considered by the American Communist Party and by Soviet officials as an instrument of Communist policy, propaganda and military intelligence.”

Herbert Marcuse, Professor of Philosophy at the University of California at San Diego advocates the destruction of our civilization through the indulgence of sexual energy, both natural and perverse.  This strange character was given grants to write his book One Dimensional Man by several foundations, including the Louis M. Rabinowitz Foundation and the Rockefeller Foundation.

AMERICAN FOREIGN SERVICE ASSOCIATION

The Donner Foundation financed a two-day conference in Washington, D.C., November 14 and 15, 1968, by the American Foreign Service Association.  Such “headliners” as Adam Yarmolinsky, a key advisor during the Kennedy administration, and Joseph Esrey Johnson, formerly of the State Department officiated.  Both these individuals favored military emasculation of the United States, and Johnson was one who cooperated with Alger Hiss in planning the United Nations.  Such a conference invites outside manipulation of the State Department, by those who have large tax-free wallets with which to dispense their gratuities.  Their political bias is also apparent.

Even with this thumbnail sketch of the activities of the giant foundations, it should be apparent that there is a serious discrepancy between the ability of a private citizen and a tax-favored group to dispose of his income.  It should also be apparent that the existence of this financially favored elite did not happen by chance.  Nor is their presence in our midst the blessing that its proponents would have us believe.  The high impact of taxes has begun to enrage Americans to the point that the danger of a tax rebellion is becoming apparent even to the free-spending rulermen in Washington.  As a result, they put on a much publicized show of considering legislation which would tax foundations and close loopholes.  Actually there is no serious intention of ever taxing foundations since the so-called representatives of the people are mostly puppets who have been put there by the untaxed money of the insider elite.  Even though the alleged humanitarian halo of the foundations is slipping badly, the legislation which has passed is a laughable mockery of tax reform.  Everybody knows that foundations and labor unions are not supposed to influence legislation, but everybody knows that they do.  A recent attempt to trim some of the power of foundations was introduced by Senator Paul Fannin (R. Ariz.).  This bill would deny tax exemption to unions which use compulsory dues for political purposes.  During the hearings of the Senate Finance Committee testimony was also received urging Congress to remove all tax privileges for any private organization using compulsory dues for any kind of political activity.  These publicized “reform measures” are usually devices to trap the unwary citizen.  The politician who introduces the measure becomes a hero.  It gives the whole group the respectable aura of attempting to do something about the issue.  It is always voted down, but few know who voted no.  The bill languishes in committee or dies.  The insiders who were directing the politicos gained their victory.

It is a well-known political fact of life that labor unions enjoy a distinct privilege in their financial structure.  There is little, if any, auditing of their funds.  There is also little, if any, supervision in the disbursement of those funds.  Strikes are called and financed regardless of the welfare of the workers involved.  Often strikes which are long and costly result in political gains for the union but cost the individual workers heavily in terms of lost income.  It has been estimated that the labor unions receive roughly $3 billion dollars income annually and about half of this amount comes from investments in business enterprises, capital gains, dividends, etc.  For example, the United Mine Workers of America owns a controlling interest in the National Bank of Washington.  This is one of the city’s largest.  It has been reported that the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers has about $4 million invested in the Washington, D.C. area in such non-union activities as supermarkets, shopping plazas and garages.

In the words of English columnist, Anthony LeJeune, “the labor unions have acquired the status of feudal barons.  Governments are afraid to touch them, no matter what the national interest requires.”^[7]

What is needed is not foundation tax reform, but the abolition of this baronial system of kingly exemption for the rulers—the abolition of our corrupt privately-owned money system, e.g., the Federal Reserve Bank and its sister in sin the 16th Amendment (the Income Tax Amendment) which has led the nation into its present quandry and quagmire of financial and related chaos.

We are now illegally under a world government setup ruled by a motley group of monetary cannibals within the United Nations and their allies in high government posts.  We are already functioning under a world constitution wherein the vast majority of individuals who vote within the world government headquarters in the United Nations are appointed.  There are still people who wonder why people with wealth and position would do such things.  It is precisely those with money and power who would do such things.  A poor man can’t control much of his environment outside of perhaps a few individuals in his own household.  But a wealthy man can control business contacts, employees, fraternal organizations, etc.  As his power and prestige increases he is able to expand his control.  This is precisely what the money manipulators have done for centuries.  The money pool discovered centuries ago that almost nobody understood the nature and functions of money.  It was this magic formula which enabled them to control currencies of nations, and from then on the path was easy.  It is often possible to purchase politicians if the price is right—and for politicians the price is right if elections and power are assured.  The manipulators operated from behind the scenes while their puppets sat on the throne, occupied presidential posts, or ranted from behind revolutionary beards.

It has long been the goal of these millionaire revolutionists to topple the American government (e.g., constitutional government).  This has already been accomplished.  Only the mop-up operations remain.  This will be the revolution in the streets where their subsidized and indoctrinated lunatics will slaughter millions of innocent people and destroy every piece of property in sight.  During the chaos and butchery the insiders will move into more overt positions of power.  Some of their political puppets may be slaughtered in the interim, but they are expendable as they will have served their purpose.  During the chaos and terror the faceless manipulators will emerge as the new rulers of the world to restore law and order—with total government tyranny the result.

It is significant that there has been very little of a serious investigative nature regarding foundations since the Reece Committee of 1953 and 1954.  At that time Mr. Edward C. Lindeman in his Wealth and Culture^[8] said, “Taken as a group, that is, as a whole, the trustees of foundations wield a power in American life which is probably equalled only by the national government itself.”  Since the publication of that book in 1936 we might add that in many instances, the foundations have taken over the programming, personnel selection and planning of many government departments.  Woodrow Wilson once said “government is essentially naked power.”  This is also certainly true of its powerful partners, the foundations and labor unions.  Many ranking politicians have taken positions on three sides of an issue—for, against, or neutral, all within the same year, but before different audiences.  It is quickly apparent that this grotesque situation will never benefit the public.  Government has degenerated into a brawl with grasping nations and minorities demanding more and more of the proceeds from the central till (our pocketbooks), until there will be nothing left.  This is the essential nature of a government and we can expect little more.  Except for a few isolated instances, politicians regard government as a cue for plunder and self enhancement.  They use the various rungs of the political ladder to increase their power and wealth and will usually make any deal necessary in order to achieve their ends.

The wretched sordidness of government at all levels will never be corrected until Americans cease to regard government as a sacred institution capable of solving problems.  It can solve nothing.  It merely creates them.  This nation has already been sold out—only a facade remains.  All this was accomplished by political prostitutes who sold America out for privilege, power and plunder.  We are now moving into the final stage of this centuries-old plan for world domination.  The same script has been repeated wherever seizure of power was obtained.  The prize—the United States—is still not 100 per cent within their grasp, but with each new repressive measure passed by a supine Congress, their goal of total domination comes ever closer.

Will our enemies, the insider manipulators and their puppet legislative bodies succeed in throwing this great nation into the horrors of bloody revolution and total government control (Socialism),^[9]  It is up to the American people.  If they do nothing but mutely accept the horrors which lie ahead, they have cast their vote.  What is your decision ?

SUMMARY

1.  Foundations are part and parcel of the Socialist plan to confiscate the legitimate earnings of citizens and transfer huge monetary monopoly to themselves through their devious tax dodges and devices.

2.  While some foundations undoubtedly do some limited good, their existence is a subversive and sinister plot against wage earning and taxpaying Americans.

3.  All foundations are created for the purpose of tax evasion and avoidance.  Many of them are engaged in the conscious and planned subversion of western civilization and the deliberate alteration of human behavior and destruction of all human rights—including the right to be human.

4.  Many foundations are not objective, philanthropic and often the recipients of their largess do so with strings attached.

5.  Foundations represent a sinister and vast power structure which enables them to control or influence legislation and to even shape foreign policy.

6.  Foundations are part of an international tie-in with similar groups throughout the world which seek to facilitate their attempted global control.

7.  Millions of dollars are being used by foundations at the present time to finance and encourage militant and revolutionary activity which has as its goal the destruction of human freedom, individualism, constitutionally guaranteed civil rights and civilization itself.

8.  Therefore, all tax exempt foundations should be legislatively outlawed.

1. Ferdinand Lundberg, The Rich and the Super Rich, New York, N.Y., Lyle Stuart, Inc., 1968.  (While the author agrees with Mr. Lundberg’s statistics, the conclusions, which call for more government, e.g. Socialism, are exactly the kind of “solution” the conspirators are seeking.)

2. “Money Made Mysterious,” American Mercury Magazine, New York, N.Y., 1958.

3. Rene Wormser, Foundations : Their Power and Influence.  New York, Devin-Adair Company, 1958, p. 96.

4. Gary Allen, “Foundations, Swindle, Treason, and Dodge,” American Opinion (November, 1969).

5. Human Events (August 24, 1968).

6. World Almanac and Book of Facts, 1970 (New York: Newspaper Enterprise Association, Inc., 1970).

7. Editorial, Chicago Tribune, September 3, 1969.

8. Wealth and Culture, Edward Lindeman, New York, New York, Harcourt, Brace & Company, 1936.

9. Communism is an abstract concept wherein the withering of the state is envisioned at some future time when a totally noble and regenerated man will live in peace and harmony, always behaving better than our ancestors did in the Garden of Eden before the fall of man.  Communism is the bait.  Socialism is the true goal—total government.  Remember, the Soviet Union is not a Communist nation.  It is called the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics.  Nazi Germany was a Socialist nation.  The word “Nazi” is a contraction of the German words “National Socialism.”  Socialism is merely a method reviving the ancient worn out notion of the “divine right of kings” dressed up in different terminology for our century.